(EMAF96)
EUROPEAN MEDIA ART FESTIVAL · 11-15 SEPTEMBER 1996 · OSNABRÜCK

The Soviet PARALLEL CINEMA

EMAF 1990


by Helmut Merschmann

The Soviet Parallel Cinema called then Cine Fantom has been constituted in 1985 around the film magazine of the same name. It brought film producers from Leningrad and Moscow together to form a subcultural underground movement. Till 1987 they projected their films in their own flats as well as in other private flats. The status of underground reinforced the common theme about taboos of the society as well as the situation which made them deal with subcultural non-public subjects such as critique of ideology, violence and homosexuality. The culminating point of this artistic period was to be the first Cine Fantom-Festival in Moscow in 1987.

As a consequence of Glasnost which enables discussions in various publications about themes forbidden in the past these subjects disappeared for the film-makers. Consequently they lost their underground identity and they have to take a new course. The festival of Riga (Forum of the non commercial cinema) which for the first time offered a place to producers not organised in institutions was important to this development.

The fusion, now called Parallel Cinema, did not think of itself as a collective superego that is active as a group and that determinates its own themes, it was rather so that each film-maker developed in a very individual way.

A lot has happened since that time. The brothers Igor and Gleb Aleinikov produced at the film academy VGIK of Moscow as well as at the debutant division of the experimental film studios of the national Mosfilm (Somebody was here). While their early works (Cruel Illness Of The Men, Metastasis, Tractor) were characterized by ironic critique on public state of affairs and while their theoretical quarrels dealt with the Soviet cinema of the twenties and of the thirties today they intend to give up this kind of direct influences.

One of their main interests is the relation of the individual and ideology Postpolitical Cinema. The film presents an exposed piece of HomeArt, a style reminding us of shaking Super-8 home-movies. Consequently the producers filmed their holiday at the Baltic around Leningrad and edited them as a montage with sequences from Soviet History.

In many of these earlier films the language is an essential part that functions like an insertion and is used asynchronoursly, or in an entangled or a simultaneous way equal to the visual part in order to distract from the significs. The new works (Somebody Was Here, Mirage) are mostly dealing with "film" aspects. Aesthetics and content, directing narrative constructions and also technical components such as direction of the camera and of the light, composition of the space move into the center of the work. The Aleinikov brothers turn explicitly away from postmodern arbitrarian style and try to use genuine (Soviet?) style in working out a film of the nineties.

The video producer Boris Juchananov works completely different. His video films do not deny the fact that he has been assistant producer for a theatre. He works with several Moscow theatre groups and apart from his video work he sets up ballets. The associative improvisation in the company is part of his film concept, every sequence is developed collectively and transposed into film whereby staging and documentation are linked together. In this way his work gains on reflection that refers to the origin of the situation and to the acting together of the actors and the camera.

His video theory (on which he is writing at the moment) contains an extremely wide gathering of material ("matrix") which he assembles individually for special presentations and for video copies ("variation"). No copy is like the others. A video philosophy is attached to it and regards that medium as linear and not discret. The temporal aspect, the length, are more important than the editing and the structural composition. At the moment Boris Juchananovis head directry at the Free Universityof Leningrad which he helped to found other directors of the Parallel Cinema such as the necrorealists from Leningrad cannot be included here or in the programme of the festival. However we would like to call attention to the 3rd Festival of the Parallel Cinema taking place in 1991.

TRAKTORA

16 mm, 13:00, UdSSR 1987, by Igor und Gleb Aleinikov.

In 1980 the power of the Soviet tractor engines amounted to 497 million horse power. Who is to be surprised that this industrial achievement induced the most important methaphor. The tractor is being associated with earth and people. "The myth that the drivers of tractors possess an extraordinary potency arises among female persons" (film text). What do female drivers of tractors think about it in the country of the functional emancipation?

SOMEBODY WAS HERE

35 mm, 42:00, UdSSR 1989, by Igor und Gleb Aleinikov.

A man comes home, finds footprints in his flat and a mysterious note: "I will be waiting at 3 o'clock at the Peking." Who is the mysterious writer, how did he get into the flat and what does he want? - The man does not find anyone at the restaurant. Written on a napkin a new meeting being proposed for the next week.

A detective kind of tracing which takes him into his own past is to begin for the man. For the film it is the beginning of a structural reflection about traces/signs and their misleading information.

BRUTAL ILLNESS OF MEN

16 mm, 12:00, UdSSR 1987 by Igor und Gleb Aleinikov.

The dance of technology, militarism, progress credibility and ideology is to be attributed to masculine authoritative thinking. Romantic abandoned industry aesthetics symbolize the civilisation decline and the human disdain. Being shown "Pictures of this world" a naive spectator falls a victim of a metaphoric homosexual rape.

METASTASEN

16 mm, 16;30, UdSSR 1985, by Igor und Gleb Aleinikov.

The compiled documentary material from educational cultural and TV films shows a Soviet tradition and reveals its decadence and the ideology in every day life. A montage which reminds of the one of Eisenstein confronts the sequences with a sound collage which elevate the culture critical tenor to a derision.

POSTPOLITICAL CINEMA

16 mm, 25:00, UdSSR 1988, by Igor und Gleb Aleinikov.

This film describes the trip of the filmmakers to Leningrad. Inserts show: words are no words, film is no film, while consumption statistics and war reports are to be heard. The Aleinikovs as tourists rowing a boat or in the streets of Leningrad in front of Eisenstein's house.

CRAZY PRINCE FASSBINDER

VHS, 44:00, UdSSR 1989, by Boris Juchananov.

Rainer Werner Faßbinder is the declared idol of the actor Evgenij Cerba. He soliloquizes in exalted tones about Faßbinder's greed for work and about his fury to live. Other artists of the Mowcow underground report about ficticious meetings with his hero. The identification and also the uselessness to want to live a myth were felt through biography and intimacy mixed to an information staccato.

Through the improvised style of the presentation the video medium seemed to be superior for that kind of themes. Aside from the implicit authenticity the style can transmit the context of the Soviet artists in an understandable way.

WING

VHS, 30:00, UdSSR 1989, by Boris Juchananov.

The first novel of Mikhail Kusmin Wings published in 1907 dealing with the love of the student Wanja to the bourgeois free idea Stroop serves as a model to this video. Historical fragments emerge: talks about literature between the boy and the novelist. From a window a nude boy playing in the snow is to be seen and this thematizes the generation conflict and the distance of the novelist to the innocence of the boy. The typewriter types: "It is necessary to hold a certain distance in order to get a real perception of the picture. "



© 1996 Aug 12 EMAF / emaf@bionic.zerberus.de


[Homepage] - [Main Menu] - [Archive] - [1990] - [This Page]